The public account of the border mill accord relies on the mill’s joint scale slips and the accord’s water-use clause. A review of that source and the field notes finds a specific limit: the count can be repeated, but it does not include a marked stone channel that feeds the mill only during the agreed hours.
Varda Kin checked the mill’s joint scale slips and the accord’s water-use clause against the field notes. The method is to trace the route from the first signal to the final gate receipt; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The comparison covers 44 mill turns recorded under the shared water allotment; 46 appear in the prior file. No signed correction to either entry was present when this review closed.
Dorin Nel, grain delegate for the Kharad Venn trade table, said the source register was complete for its stated purpose. The office has not provided a separate measure for how two settlements can share a mill without turning each dry week into a dispute over priority, so the public record cannot yet show which account is more representative.
The accord assigns turns by season; both delegations say the other has carried forward last season’s exception as a rule. The current record does not settle that disagreement. This report does not establish that either side misstated the evidence. It establishes that the published total is narrower than the conclusion being drawn from it.
A public vote has approved a narrow change while leaving the larger question open. The entry belongs to the closeout hearing file at the shared flour table at the north border mill. The joint table will publish the turn schedule with every exception dated. The next file should preserve the original entries and explain any change in method.
