A decision on the lower clinic roster should be judged by what happens at the Lower Ward clinic beside the warm-water hall. The docket is at step 1 of the current review. Its latest entry reads: A new complaint or proposal has been entered under a dated docket. A rule that looks complete in the chamber can still leave the people who use it carrying an unmeasured cost.
27 unfilled clinic hours were entered this cycle, compared with 27 in the prior file. That comparison matters because the public summary counts entries. The open question is whether one rotating healer can cover the lower ward without delaying urgent referrals.
The office counts a filled post when a substitute is named; patients count the hours between the first call and an arrival. The current record does not settle that disagreement. The objection deserves a direct answer, but it is not a reason to make the rule permanent before the affected residents can check the method.
Runa Ash checked the night roster, medicine cupboard log and referral slips against the field notes. The method is to separate available stock from stock that can reach a patient in time; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The practical evidence is a slate schedule with a blank space where the second night healer should be; any new measure should record that condition beside the total.
The chamber should approve a limited trial with a published end date, a way to record exceptions and a named reviewer. The health table will compare roster gaps with arrival times for the same nights. That is the narrowest decision that can be defended from the evidence now available.
