Q: What changed in the public reading review?
Dori Tharn: The docket has returned for review with the exceptions and unresolved objections attached. That changes what is in the file; it does not, by itself, change the rule.
Q: Which entry should residents look at first?
Dori Tharn: the rope fiber samples and the hoist’s load-and-stop book. This cycle records 48 test lifts completed under load, against 44 in the last count. The dates and the method matter as much as the total.
Q: Why is there still a disagreement?
Dori Tharn: The examiner has found no failed fibers; the crew argues that a rope can pass a bench test and still behave badly under a stop. We have not found a single measure that answers both accounts.
Q: What will the next check tell you?
Dori Tharn: The next trial will record a full stop with a stone load matched to the heaviest routine cart. If it is recorded by another crew, we can see whether the first result was about the method or about the place.
Q: What should the public not infer yet?
Dori Tharn: That a lower or higher count settles when to retire the main rope without cutting the only heavy route to the lower workshops. It tells us what was entered, not who should carry the cost.
