The public account of the first-room keys relies on the key register and the waiting list for family rooms. A review of that source and the field notes finds a specific limit: the count can be repeated, but it does not include a row of numbered keys hanging beside the house’s shared water board.
Eni Ved checked the key register and the waiting list for family rooms against the field notes. The method is to ask who can use a service without an interpreter, sponsor or spare hour; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The comparison covers 66 families assigned a room before their temporary bed expires; 63 appear in the prior file. No signed correction to either entry was present when this review closed.
Bera Noll, housing advocate at the welcome desk, said the source register was complete for its stated purpose. The office has not provided a separate measure for how the city assigns a first room when family size and district capacity do not line up, so the public record cannot yet show which account is more representative.
The current list favors earlier arrival; advocates say it can split a household whose members reached the gate on different caravans. The current record does not settle that disagreement. This report does not establish that either side misstated the evidence. It establishes that the published total is narrower than the conclusion being drawn from it.
The first implementation notes have been compared with the promise in the minutes. The entry belongs to the follow-up survey file at the South Welcome House above the lower market stairs. The housing table will publish the wait by household size, not only by place in line. The next file should preserve the original entries and explain any change in method.
