Q: What changed in the inspection order review?
Ava Korr: The affected crew has tried the revised procedure under ordinary working conditions. That changes what is in the file; it does not, by itself, change the rule.
Q: Which entry should residents look at first?
Ava Korr: the sealed flood map, the copy register and the mapmaker’s loose notes. This cycle records 38 marked waterways compared with the modern survey, against 37 in the last count. The dates and the method matter as much as the total.
Q: Why is there still a disagreement?
Ava Korr: The mapmaker’s notes were added decades later; the archive has not found a matching field survey. We have not found a single measure that answers both accounts.
Q: What will the next check tell you?
Ava Korr: The archive will publish a high-resolution copy with each later mark dated separately. If it is recorded by another crew, we can see whether the first result was about the method or about the place.
Q: What should the public not infer yet?
Ava Korr: That a lower or higher count settles whether the old route is evidence of a lost spill channel or simply a copyist’s correction mark. It tells us what was entered, not who should carry the cost.
