The public account of the lower ward hearing relies on the speaker queue, interpreter roster and final meeting minutes. A review of that source and the field notes finds a specific limit: the count can be repeated, but it does not include a chalk-marked speaking board beside the hall’s narrow stone entrance.
Sella Mor checked the speaker queue, interpreter roster and final meeting minutes against the field notes. The method is to listen for the point where an abstract rule becomes a household obligation; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The comparison covers 54 speakers who stayed through the vote; 56 appear in the prior file. No signed correction to either entry was present when this review closed.
Sera Venn, chair of the ward’s elected table, said the source register was complete for its stated purpose. The office has not provided a separate measure for whether ward residents can question a proposal before it is reduced to a yes-or-no vote, so the public record cannot yet show which account is more representative.
The old queue gives precedence to registered household heads; younger workers and recent arrivals say that rule screens out people most affected by the night schedule. The current record does not settle that disagreement. This report does not establish that either side misstated the evidence. It establishes that the published total is narrower than the conclusion being drawn from it.
The first implementation notes have been compared with the promise in the minutes. The entry belongs to the first register file at the Lower Ward meeting hall. The ward table will test a second speaking queue at its next open sitting. The next file should preserve the original entries and explain any change in method.
