Q: What changed in the follow-up survey review?
Sera Venn: A new complaint or proposal has been entered under a dated docket. That changes what is in the file; it does not, by itself, change the rule.
Q: Which entry should residents look at first?
Sera Venn: the speaker queue, interpreter roster and final meeting minutes. This cycle records 57 speakers who stayed through the vote, against 61 in the last count. The dates and the method matter as much as the total.
Q: Why is there still a disagreement?
Sera Venn: The old queue gives precedence to registered household heads; younger workers and recent arrivals say that rule screens out people most affected by the night schedule. We have not found a single measure that answers both accounts.
Q: What will the next check tell you?
Sera Venn: The ward table will test a second speaking queue at its next open sitting. If it is recorded by another crew, we can see whether the first result was about the method or about the place.
Q: What should the public not infer yet?
Sera Venn: That a lower or higher count settles whether ward residents can question a proposal before it is reduced to a yes-or-no vote. It tells us what was entered, not who should carry the cost.
