The public account of the medicine trade relies on the remedy row’s origin tags and the public price board. A review of that source and the field notes finds a specific limit: the count can be repeated, but it does not include the blue thread tied around each bundle inspected by the remedy steward.
Nima Thol checked the remedy row’s origin tags and the public price board against the field notes. The method is to put the posted price beside the amount that actually changed hands; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The comparison covers 58 bundles carrying a verified origin mark; 59 appear in the prior file. No signed correction to either entry was present when this review closed.
Tessa Orun, seller of dried mountain herbs, said the source register was complete for its stated purpose. The office has not provided a separate measure for whether the origin check protects buyers without pricing local gatherers out of the hall, so the public record cannot yet show which account is more representative.
The steward says a traceable mark prevents substitution; gatherers say the new inspection fee exceeds the value of a small bundle. The current record does not settle that disagreement. This report does not establish that either side misstated the evidence. It establishes that the published total is narrower than the conclusion being drawn from it.
Residents and workers have had their first chance to question the measure in public. The entry belongs to the follow-up survey file at the covered remedy row in the Lower Market Hall. The hall will review the fee beside the last three market prices. The next file should preserve the original entries and explain any change in method.
