Q: What changed in the first register review?
Reldan Oss: A second set of hands has checked the count and recorded where the methods differ. That changes what is in the file; it does not, by itself, change the rule.
Q: Which entry should residents look at first?
Reldan Oss: the threshold inventory and the release slips signed by conservators. This cycle records 32 objects with a public catalogue entry, against 33 in the last count. The dates and the method matter as much as the total.
Q: Why is there still a disagreement?
Reldan Oss: The first catalogue calls the objects ceremonial; conservators say the recovered context is too mixed to confirm their use. We have not found a single measure that answers both accounts.
Q: What will the next check tell you?
Reldan Oss: The archive will separate observed material from attributed history in each entry. If it is recorded by another crew, we can see whether the first result was about the method or about the place.
Q: What should the public not infer yet?
Reldan Oss: That a lower or higher count settles how to describe objects from the sealed gallery without claiming a history the evidence cannot support. It tells us what was entered, not who should carry the cost.
