The first sealed gallery catalogue notice began with the threshold inventory and the release slips signed by conservators. Since then, the city has moved through a source check, a public hearing and a trial at the catalogue desk at the Old Gallery threshold.
The current docket records 12 objects with a public catalogue entry; the earlier file recorded 8. The count is more specific than the first summary, but still does not answer how to describe objects from the sealed gallery without claiming a history the evidence cannot support.
A key point in the timeline was the discovery of a small clay tag whose number does not match the number in the register. It narrowed the dispute from a general claim about the rule to a question about how the rule behaves at the site.
The first catalogue calls the objects ceremonial; conservators say the recovered context is too mixed to confirm their use. The current record does not settle that disagreement. The parties now share more of the record than they did at the start, though they assign it different weight.
The affected crew has tried the revised procedure under ordinary working conditions. The entry belongs to the second register file at the catalogue desk at the Old Gallery threshold. The archive will separate observed material from attributed history in each entry. The next review will show whether the change lasts beyond this docket or returns as another temporary exception.
