The public account of the shared cistern lease relies on the lease copies and the cistern maintenance ledger. A review of that source and the field notes finds a specific limit: the count can be repeated, but it does not include a repair clause copied by hand into a margin too narrow for the full schedule.
Eni Ved checked the lease copies and the cistern maintenance ledger against the field notes. The method is to ask who can use a service without an interpreter, sponsor or spare hour; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The comparison covers 44 leases that name a shared repair duty; 43 appear in the prior file. No signed correction to either entry was present when this review closed.
Toma Vesh, tenant delegate for the Lantern Stair rooms, said the source register was complete for its stated purpose. The office has not provided a separate measure for whether tenants can be billed for a repair when the lease does not say how the cost is divided, so the public record cannot yet show which account is more representative.
The landlord cites a customary duty; residents say a custom cannot replace a written amount. The current record does not settle that disagreement. This report does not establish that either side misstated the evidence. It establishes that the published total is narrower than the conclusion being drawn from it.
The affected crew has tried the revised procedure under ordinary working conditions. The entry belongs to the public comment close file at the residents’ desk at Lantern Stair House. The housing clerk will compare the disputed clause with the signed copies held by both sides. The next file should preserve the original entries and explain any change in method.
