The public account of the stone chorus relies on the hall’s rehearsal schedule and the chorus’s shared verse book. A review of that source and the field notes finds a specific limit: the count can be repeated, but it does not include a low ledge where singers can hear the second return of the hall’s echo.
Ava Korr checked the hall’s rehearsal schedule and the chorus’s shared verse book against the field notes. The method is to note who made a record, who preserved it and who can still consult it; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The comparison covers 30 ward groups represented at open rehearsals; 32 appear in the prior file. No signed correction to either entry was present when this review closed.
Neri Varn, conductor of the mixed-ward stone chorus, said the source register was complete for its stated purpose. The office has not provided a separate measure for whether the city can preserve a shared chorus while allowing each ward to keep its own verses, so the public record cannot yet show which account is more representative.
The music steward wants one agreed version for the annual ceremony; singers say variants are part of the record, not errors. The current record does not settle that disagreement. This report does not establish that either side misstated the evidence. It establishes that the published total is narrower than the conclusion being drawn from it.
The clerk has matched the claim to its source register and named the missing record. The entry belongs to the first register file at the public chorus steps in the Hall of Echoes. The next rehearsal will mark shared lines and ward-specific verses separately. The next file should preserve the original entries and explain any change in method.
