The public account of the ward school slates relies on the lesson rota and the slate-room attendance marks. A review of that source and the field notes finds a specific limit: the count can be repeated, but it does not include a set of practice slates shared between the day and evening groups.
Eni Ved checked the lesson rota and the slate-room attendance marks against the field notes. The method is to ask who can use a service without an interpreter, sponsor or spare hour; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The comparison covers 29 evening lessons held with a full teaching pair; 25 appear in the prior file. No signed correction to either entry was present when this review closed.
Ari Deth, teacher responsible for the evening slate room, said the source register was complete for its stated purpose. The office has not provided a separate measure for whether the school can add language lessons without taking the only writing hour from apprentices, so the public record cannot yet show which account is more representative.
Families ask for more lessons after the work bell; teachers say the same hour is already promised to trade apprentices. The current record does not settle that disagreement. This report does not establish that either side misstated the evidence. It establishes that the published total is narrower than the conclusion being drawn from it.
The responsible office has offered a limited remedy with an end date for review. The entry belongs to the open-book review file at the slate room at North Rise school. The school table will test a split session and record who can attend each half. The next file should preserve the original entries and explain any change in method.
