A decision on the warm-water hall should be judged by what happens at the public warm-water hall in the Lower Ward. The docket is at step 9 of the current review. Its latest entry reads: The first implementation notes have been compared with the promise in the minutes. A rule that looks complete in the chamber can still leave the people who use it carrying an unmeasured cost.
57 water rotations completed before the final bell were entered this cycle, compared with 54 in the prior file. That comparison matters because the public summary counts entries. The open question is how to preserve access to the public baths while the settling basin is repaired.
A shortened schedule reduces wear on the basin; families who rely on the evening rotation say daytime hours are not an equal substitute. The current record does not settle that disagreement. The objection deserves a direct answer, but it is not a reason to make the rule permanent before the affected residents can check the method.
Runa Ash checked the bath rotation chart and the settling basin checks against the field notes. The method is to separate available stock from stock that can reach a patient in time; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The practical evidence is a chalk line on the basin wall showing the last safe draw before cleaning; any new measure should record that condition beside the total.
The chamber should approve a limited trial with a published end date, a way to record exceptions and a named reviewer. The steward will post an evening rotation for residents who work the late shift. That is the narrowest decision that can be defended from the evidence now available.
