The first water queue notice began with the public queue board and the sluice keeper’s release marks. Since then, the city has moved through a source check, a public hearing and a trial at the Seventh Bridge landing.
The current docket records 28 posted collection turns; the earlier file recorded 31. The count is more specific than the first summary, but still does not answer whether a posted queue can remain fair when the flow slows at the end of a long stair.
A key point in the timeline was the discovery of a line of copper tags that households move when a release is delayed. It narrowed the dispute from a general claim about the rule to a question about how the rule behaves at the site.
The water office counts collection turns; residents count the hours they wait beside a dry cistern. The current record does not settle that disagreement. The parties now share more of the record than they did at the start, though they assign it different weight.
The docket has returned for review with the exceptions and unresolved objections attached. The entry belongs to the trial period file at the Seventh Bridge landing. An observer from the Upper Reservoir will time a full release at both landings. The next review will show whether the change lasts beyond this docket or returns as another temporary exception.
