The public account of the water queue relies on the public queue board and the sluice keeper’s release marks. A review of that source and the field notes finds a specific limit: the count can be repeated, but it does not include a line of copper tags that households move when a release is delayed.
Sella Mor checked the public queue board and the sluice keeper’s release marks against the field notes. The method is to listen for the point where an abstract rule becomes a household obligation; it confirms the entries, but not every interpretation attached to them. The comparison covers 10 posted collection turns; 10 appear in the prior file. No signed correction to either entry was present when this review closed.
Deli Arven, elected steward for the bridge households, said the source register was complete for its stated purpose. The office has not provided a separate measure for whether a posted queue can remain fair when the flow slows at the end of a long stair, so the public record cannot yet show which account is more representative.
The water office counts collection turns; residents count the hours they wait beside a dry cistern. The current record does not settle that disagreement. This report does not establish that either side misstated the evidence. It establishes that the published total is narrower than the conclusion being drawn from it.
The responsible office has offered a limited remedy with an end date for review. The entry belongs to the district return file at the Seventh Bridge landing. An observer from the Upper Reservoir will time a full release at both landings. The next file should preserve the original entries and explain any change in method.
